A Meeting at the Crossroads

In a parallel dimension of time, the first light of dawn revealed a bucolic landscape. Morning fog lifted from green fields. Silhouettes of scattered oak trees were like ink strokes in the mist. A nearby brook murmured over stones as birds offered their first notes of the day.

At the center of this suspended countryside, two dirt roads converged at a crossroads beneath an ancient sycamore. Its leaves caught droplets of dew like sequins, and a faint breeze carried the scent of wet grass.

That’s when the meeting occurred.

From the western path came the sound of sandals brushing loose gravel. A hooded figure, dressed in a robe of simple linen, walked with an unhurried pace. Simultaneously from the east, another figure approached. This one wore a saffron cloak with its hood tied loosely at his throat.

Just as the sun had cleared the horizon, their paths intersected beneath the tree and they stopped.

The one in linen pulled back his hood. His beard was full but trimmed, his dark hair falling to his shoulders. His eyes were warm and alert, and he smiled with a grace that could disarm the hardest heart.

“Peace to you, traveler,” he said.

The saffron-robed man lifted his own hood and returned the smile. His face was calm, and his eyes held the serenity of mountain lakes. He bowed his head slightly.

“And peace to you, also.”

They regarded each other for a moment, wind stirring the leaves above them.

“It seems,” said the man in linen, “that even though we came from opposite directions, we were meant to meet at this exact moment. Even more curious, we understand each other’s native tongues.”

 “Perhaps these paths are not what they appear,” the other replied.

The man in linen chuckled softly. “They rarely are.”

The other studied him carefully, recognition lighting his features. “I know of you. The stories of your compassion travel far beyond time. You are Yeshua of Nazareth.”

“And you,” Yeshua answered, his voice touched with reverence, “must be Siddhartha Gautama, the one they call the Buddha, the Awakened One.”

The fog thinned as if to give their meeting more space. The men stared deeply into each other’s eyes.

“Will you sit with me?” said Yeshua, motioning to a massive log beside the crossroads.

Siddhartha nodded. “It will be my pleasure.”

They sat beside each other on bark worn smooth by weary travelers. For a while, neither one spoke as the morning settled warmly around them.

At length, Siddhartha broke the silence.

“It is rare,” he said, “to meet one whose words have shaped the hearts of so many, not only in the past but for ages to come. Your teachings have been transmitted across every continent of this earth.”

Yeshua tilted his head, thoughtful. “Hundreds of earth years separated our lives, but I have also heard of your far-reaching influence. Your path of liberation, your understanding of suffering and how to end it. I know that countless people have been healed because of your teachings and example.”

Siddhartha folded his hands in his lap. “I simply gave witness to what I discovered in my own struggles. I found that freedom begins within. If our mind is tangled, the world appears tangled as well. If our heart is bound up by chasing illusions, no external revolution, no remedy of any government, can loosen its knots.”

Yeshua nodded thoughtfully. “I understand. And yet, societies can crush even the most open hearts with their oppression and violence. Like you, I tended to the wounds of my followers’ souls, but I also challenged systems of oppression. Sometimes the sickness is personal. Sometimes it is communal.”

A soft rustle of wings sounded overhead as a raven landed on one of the sycamore’s branches, cocking its head at them with curiosity.

“I would like to know,” said Siddhartha. “How did you learn the compassion that shaped your path?”

Yeshua took a deep breath. “It started early. My parents taught me that our Creator fashioned every one of us in the divine image. They encouraged me to see this divinity in each person, no matter how low their condition. Later, as I walked from town to town, I looked into the eyes of the poor, the broken, the shunned, and I recognized them as my kin.”

He paused, the memory of dusty Galilean roads flickering in his eyes. “I touched the lepers when others fled. I ate with tax collectors and prostitutes. I tried to help them heal not only their bodies, but their sense of worth in the eyes of God. I saw beauty where others saw disgrace. But please know this. It wasn’t just an effort of my own will that caused this. It was a gift from my Heavenly Father, a calling that I embraced.”

A smile warmed Siddhartha’s face. “I have no belief in deities, but my earthly father surely affected me. He raised me to take my place in the upper class of Brahmins. I still remember his anger and disappointment when I left the palace where I had been raised. I threw off the privileges that shielded me and sought to understand suffering by witnessing it firsthand. I came across the sick, the aged, the dying, and each encounter shaped me.” He turned his head to gaze down the eastern road. “I saw that compassion is not merely a virtue. It is a law of nature. I taught my disciples to love all beings as a mother loves her only child.”

Yeshua leaned forward slightly, intrigued. “Yes. To love beyond all the conditions taught to us by the world. Even to forgive those who wound us.”

Siddhartha’s eyes softened. “You forgave even as you suffered greatly.”

Yeshua nodded and lowered his gaze. “It was hardest thing I ever did, but I saw that those who harmed me were trapped in their own fear and ignorance.” He paused. “And you, my new friend, renounced the wealth of a kingdom. I merely left a carpentry practice that I shared with my father.”

Siddhartha chuckled. “You make it sound superhuman, but it was a matter of my own survival. I was suffocating in gilded bondage. Silk chains are still chains. I knew that my contentment would never be found in luxury.

Yeshua nodded. “I also taught that the love of wealth blinds us. This earth’s riches exist to be shared with the poor, not hoarded by the powerful.”

“Tell more about your notions of generosity.”

Yeshua shrugged. “My words are simple. I teach that wealth is not measured by possessions but by giving. I once encountered a widow who offered two small coins to the temple treasury. They were worth less than a cup of water. Yet she gave more than all the wealthy combined, because she offered everything she had out of love.”

“Intent over quantity,” said Siddhartha. “Purity over display.”

“Exactly.”

“In my own teachings,” Siddhartha said, “I spoke of dāna, the perfection of giving without the attachment of expecting a reward. As we practice dāna and grow more enlightened, there is a sublime offering we have for others. I call it the gift of fearlessness. To me, this is perhaps the highest form of generosity because it helps ease the anxiety and turmoil of others.”

Yeshua looked moved. “I mostly agree. But a hungry person would much prefer a loaf of bread over a philosophical truth. Either way, I taught that when we comfort others, we become a light in the darkness.”

The raven took wing, drifting gracefully over the countryside towards the horizon. Both men followed its flight with their eyes.

“Our teachings align in many ways,” said Siddhartha. “Compassion, nonviolence, and generosity. Yet there is that difference you already mentioned. Perhaps it is rooted in the worlds from which we came.”

Yeshua turned to him. “Yes. I feel it too.”

Siddhartha’s voice grew introspective. “I would like to discuss this more fully if you are willing,”

“Of course,” said Yeshua.

“My path focuses on the individual,” Siddhartha continued. “I teach that if each person frees themselves from desire and delusion, then suffering decreases in the world. A tree grows strong when each root is healthy, not when we try to force the whole forest into harmony.”

Yeshua’s eyes shone with understanding.  “Go on, please.”

“I believe that a liberated consciousness radiates outward naturally. Peace in one person becomes a lantern for those nearby.”

Yeshua gazed down the western road. “While I agree with you in many ways, I walked among people who were burdened by more than their own desires. They suffered under a conquering empire, unjust rulers, and a religious structure that was burdensome rather than uplifting. So I spoke directly to those powers. I confronted corruption. I overturned tables in the temple. I challenged those who used their sacred laws to exploit the vulnerable.”

A gust of wind stirred the leaves above.

Siddhartha considered this. “Your liberation was both inner and outer.”

“Yes,” Yeshua said. “Because a society can trap a soul as surely as craving can.”

“And yet you carried no weapon.”

“Love was my only force,” Yeshua replied simply. “The moment we harm another, we harm ourselves.”

Siddhartha smiled. “In this, we are brothers, even though I question if societal structures will ever truly change. One only needs to view the entirety of human history to see how oppression continues from generation to generation, how violence begets violence.”

Sunlight slanted across their faces. For a moment the men seemed less like historical figures and more like long-term companions sharing memories.

Yeshua clasped his hands together. “Siddhartha,” he said gently, “your path turned inward to heal the roots of suffering within the heart.”

“Yes,” the Buddha said. “That was my way.”

“I also sought a kingdom of the heart,” Yeshua said, “but one that actively confronted the unjust structures of the world.”

Siddhartha breathed in the scent of the fields surrounding them, “I often wondered if my path should have addressed the world more directly. But I feared that confronting systems would drag me into the very entanglements I sought to dissolve. How can you uproot a poisonous tree while remaining free from the toxin?”

Yeshua gazed upward as the sunlight gathered strength. “I wondered the opposite. Sometimes confronting those forces only made them more determined to strike back. It also sharpened my tongue and my approach. Perhaps my willingness to challenge them so openly hastened not only my own suffering, but that of others as well. Yet I felt compelled to name injustice wherever I saw it.”

Siddhartha bowed his head in recognition. “Different approaches. Neither of them easy.”

“Yes,” Yeshua murmured, “very different methods. But we both sought peace.”

“And unity among all beings,” Siddhartha added. “A world where compassion is like the air that people breathe.”

They looked at each other with quiet, profound understanding.

Siddhartha looked up at the branches of the sycamore. “Sitting here reminds me of the most important night of my life. I had tried one form of meditation and asceticism after another. Finally, weary that I would ever experience full awakening, I sat beneath an enormous tree, determined to break through or die on that spot.”

Something caught in Yeshua’s voice. “I, too, found my greatest moment of victory with my back against a tree’s wood. It was only then, in the depths of my worst suffering, that I was able to embrace the fullness of what I had taught.”

They both fell into silence, recalling the pathways that led to this moment outside of time.

Finally, Yeshua rose to his feet. Siddhartha followed. They stood facing one another.

Siddhartha said, “The world is large, Yeshua. Too large for one method alone.”

“You speak the truth,” Yeshua replied. “The world needs multiple invitations toward wholeness.”

Siddhartha’s eyes brightened. “Then may our teachings be like two rivers flowing toward the same sea.”

The wind picked up again, rustling their robes. Yeshua extended his arms and embraced Siddhartha. The Buddha returned the embrace without hesitation.

When they stepped back, Siddhartha placed his palms together at his heart and bowed. “May all beings find the end of suffering. May you walk in peace, my friend Yeshua.”

Yeshua lifted his right hand in blessing. “Shalom aleichem. Peace be upon you, Siddhartha, wherever your steps lead.”

They smiled like two old friends on that road between worlds, joined for a moment where past and future dissolve.

Then, with no further words, they turned.  Siddhartha headed westward to new horizons, the sun casting his shadow before him. Yeshua walked eastward with a new understanding, his shadow following behind him.

 The crossroads was quiet, except for the wind in the sycamore and birdsongs echoing over the fields.

And for a breath of time outside of time, the world felt a bit more whole.

Protestin’ in the Wind

Spittin’ in the wind, pissin’ in the wind, protestin’ in the wind. Call it what you want, but that’s what it felt like on a recent Sunday.

I was visiting the care facility where my parents live in Las Vegas, so I decided to join them at their church, hitching a ride in the medical transport van. I don’t adhere to a religion, so it’s hard to sit through any worship service. But this conservative Lutheran version was especially dissonant, like a cheese grater across my brain. Every element of the liturgy made me wince.

  • Hymns that spoke of Jesus coming again in clouds of glory to gather only “the faithful.”
  • Multiple promises of being in heaven rather than working to bring justice on earth.
  • A unison confession of sin that magnified our abject condition apart from Jesus’s saving grace.
  • The Apostle’s Creed, that patriarchal relic with its Trinitarian formula and insistence on superstitious miracles.

What tweaked me the most, however, was the sermon. I had foolishly hoped that the pastor might be hip, since I noticed the motorcycle boots he wore under his alb. It was clearly part of his drip. When I asked, “you ride?” he responded, “yep, it’s the only time I feel free.”

Then came his homily. Its central illustration came from a memorial service he’d attended for a teen who died of a drug overdose. There were two preachers that day. One railed about how the girl didn’t “know Jesus,” and that everyone in attendance should be forewarned about their own salvation. The other preacher was more magnanimous. He revealed a private conversation in which he discovered that the girl had indeed “accepted the Lord.”

That assurance rankled me even more!

I know I should have restrained myself. I chose to be there, live and let live, avoid the landmines of religion and politics. Yeah, yeah. But if there’s anything remaining from my former religious leanings, it’s that I’m a protestant, emphasis on protest.

I approached the pastor after the service.

“Do you mind if I share a reaction to your message?”

“Not at all,” he replied.

I calmed my voice. “Your own scripture says that God is love. God loved this girl before she was born, during every painful hour of her addiction, and even now in whatever awaits us after death. That’s true whether or not she followed your religious formula. Do you really believe that if she hadn’t accepted Jesus, she would be banished into darkness?”

His expression changed. His smile grew tighter. His eyes narrowed.

“Yes, God is love. And God gives us free will to either accept or reject the promises of Jesus.”

It was a standard feint, not a real answer, so I continued.

“On the cross, Jesus said ‘it is finished.’ That applies to all of humanity. It’s a love so inclusive that no human mind can fully understand it.”

His smile slipped further, frown lines forming on his brow.

“You must be a universalist,” he said.

And there it was. Spittin’ in the wind, pissin’ in the wind, protestin’ in the wind. Nothing I said would change his world view; nothing he said would alter mine. In this polarized world—with our moats of doctrine, politics, and privilege—hasn’t this become the norm?

When Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde recently exhorted Donald Trump to have mercy and understand the apprehension felt by many Americans, my friends and I applauded her bravery. Face to face, speaking truth to power. Social media blew up with her image, her words, and profile pics that proclaimed, “I’m with her.”

But Trump and his allies, encamped on el otro lado del rio, were unmoved. They demanded an apology, accusing Budde of being woke, radical left, and mannish.

Spittin’ in the wind, pissin’ in the wind, protestin’ in the wind. It’s the norm, and the fact that our online news streams are shaped by predatory AI only makes the problem worse. As Paul Simon said in The Boxer, “A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest.”

(Flashback. On May 4, 1970, Allison Krause, a student at Kent State University, was one of four unarmed students shot and killed by soldiers of the Ohio Army National Guard. The shootings occurred as students protested against both the invasion of Cambodia and the National Guard presence on their campus. The day before her death, Krause observed a single lilac within the barrel of a guardsman’s gun. An officer ordered the soldier to remove it, and Krause caught the flower as it fell to the ground, stating, “Flowers are better than bullets.” This quote—inscribed on her gravestone—has become synonymous with her legacy of peace activism.)

Return to the present. The US continues to arm countries around the world, especially Israel as it carried out its genocide against the Palestinians. And Donald Trump threatens troop deployment to quell domestic demonstrations.

Can you hear the wind whistling, loud and clear?

Should You Take It Personally?

It was one of those conversations with a friend that I crave—wide-ranging, both intimate and global, drawing on our interests in literature, history, and current events. During the course of it, a philosophical question arose: “Should we take things personally?”

You may have an immediate answer but stay with the question for a moment.

In his popular book, The Four Agreements: A Practical Guide to Personal Freedom, Don Miguel Ruiz talks about the “domestication of humans.” From the moment we are born, he says, “outside” information is transferred to us internally, creating the “agreements” we make about ourselves and our place in the world. This transfusion comes through tribes, families, schools, and religions.

Given this maze of conflicting and often capricious viewpoints, Ruiz proposes the second of his four agreements. Don’t take anything personally. “Whatever you think,” he says, “and whatever you feel, I know is your problem and not my problem. It is the way you see the world. It is nothing personal, because you are dealing with yourself, not with me. Others are going to have their own opinion according to their belief system, so nothing they think about me is really about me, but it is about them.”

OK. There’s some truth here. How many of us have allowed our self-worth to be dragged through the muck of other people’s judgments? How many of us have allowed them to lease space in our heads, squandering our precious time and our unique destinies?

Wayne Dyer, a thinker I admired, steadfastly refused to take a side in conflicts, believing that the very act of aligning ourselves fuels the power of dualistic madness tearing our planet apart. He called us to stay centered in a place of unity and compassion for all of creation, including every single person who disagrees with us, even our enemies

Again, great value here. Many an enlightened spiritual teacher—among them the Buddha, Jesus, and Baháʼu’lláh—walked this higher plain in their teachings and actions.

But let’s go back to that conversation with my friend. Why? Because, to refute Ruiz, the decisions that people make, especially those in power, go far beyond just dealing with themselves. They affect all of us!

In our dialogue that morning, my friend and I turned to the current political scene, especially the rise of Christian Nationalism, that cult that misappropriates the teachings of Jesus and cloaks itself in American Exceptionalism. We lamented the erosion of a woman’s reproductive rights, the backlash against the LGBTQ population, the disregard for global warming, the demonization of immigrants and protestors, the undermining of public healthcare and education, and the threats leveled at social security.

Should we take this personally? Hell yes! Even if it causes some anger and angst? Hell yes! Read, really read, the background and content of Project 2025, a list of legislative and policy proposals that is ready to roll if Trump gets reelected.

Should we take the defeat of this agenda personally? Absolutely!

My friend is Jewish, and he recalled a famous poem by Martin Niemöller, a German theologian and Lutheran pastor during the rise of Nazism. It exists in many versions, but the one featured on the United States Holocaust Memorial reads: “First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.” For his opposition to the Nazis’ state control of churches, Niemöller was imprisoned in the Sachsenhausen and Dachau concentration camps from 1938 to 1945. He narrowly escaped execution.

It reminded me of words from Martin Luther King, Jr. that have informed my activism for decades. “In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.”

Within the wider circle of my Christian friends, there’s a lot of talk about respecting the voices of those who disagree with us. Instead of red or blue, they champion the color purple. Listen; I agree that we need to reach across the boundaries of our differences. As Jesus so powerfully said, If you love only those who love you, what good is that? Even scoundrels do that much. If you are friendly only to your friends, how are you different from anyone else?” (Matthew 5:46-17a, Living Bible Translation). Can we champion the causes of justice nonviolently, opposing those who would erode our freedoms without disrespecting them? Harder, much harder, but yes!

However, if our efforts to be conciliatory cause us to muzzle ourselves and cease speaking truth to power, I object! If they lead us to accommodate the principles outlined in White Nationalist movements like Project 2025, I object!

I wholeheartedly support Kamala Harris as our next President of the United States. When I scroll through the many memes circulating around her candidacy, I love the one that says, “Rosa sat, so Ruby could walk, so Kamala could run.”

Did Rosa Parks take it personally when she was ordered to sit in the back of Montgomery, Alabama buses? Certainly! Did those who fought for school desegregation take it personally? Of course!

Parks once commented, “People have said over the years that the reason I did not give up my seat was because I was tired. I did not think of being physically tired. My feet were not hurting. I was tired in a different way. I was tired of seeing so many men treated as boys and not called by their proper names or titles. I was tired of seeing children and women mistreated and disrespected because of the color of their skin. I was tired of Jim Crow laws, of legally enforced racial segregation.”

Today, I am personally saying that I am sick and tired of Christian Nationalism and its idolatry. It’s not only an aberration; it’s a dangerous mutation. I will do everything in my sphere of influence to defeat those forces that seek to form a theocratic government in America.

And if you have made it to the end of this piece, I hope that you, too, will take this election and its repercussions PERSONALLY!

Rosa sat, so Ruby could walk, so Kamala could run!